<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486</id><updated>2011-04-21T19:09:20.281-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Andrew's Blog</title><subtitle type='html'>This blog is part of the course requirement for my English 1101 class at Georgia Tech.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>14</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-107084198932791467</id><published>2003-12-07T19:00:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-12-08T01:23:05.793-05:00</updated><title type='text'>So This is the End. . .</title><content type='html'>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This semester we focused primarily on technology and its effects on communication and society. At the beginning of the year we focused on readings in &lt;em&gt;Good Reasons&lt;/em&gt;. We learned how to write essays and how to argue using ethos, pathos, and logos. We also began our journey into the world of blogging. Each student in the class created his or her own blog and started posting in it. We began by exploring other blogs, such as &lt;a href="http://www.rachellucas.com/"&gt;Rachel Lucas’&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.joannejacobs.com/"&gt;Joanne Jacobs’&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.tomdaschle.com/blog/"&gt;Tom Daschle’s&lt;/a&gt;, and getting a feel for the different styles of blogging. The style of each of these writers greatly influenced many students in the class. From our readings in &lt;em&gt;Good Reasons&lt;/em&gt; and our exploration of the world of blogging we were able to write our first essay; a rhetorical analysis of a blog entry. For &lt;a href="http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gtg910q/ENGL/Essay1.htm"&gt;my essay&lt;/a&gt; I chose &lt;a href="http://www.andrewsullivan.com/"&gt;Andrew Sullivan&lt;/a&gt;’s article &lt;a href="http://andrewsullivan.com/main_article.php?artnum=20030803"&gt;“Can Dean Win? The Pros and Cons of an Insurgent”&lt;/a&gt; as my blog post to analyze. My essay discussed the audience that Sullivan was targeting, the purpose of his argument, and what his argument actually was. The strongest part of the paper was my discussion of his audience. I was able to easily identify his target audience and discuss how he appeals to this audience. I struggled with the conclusion, however, as I always do. Conclusions and transitions have always been my struggling points in all papers. The conclusion for this paper was rather weak; more of a summary of my topic sentences and thesis than an actual wrap-up of the paper. As a whole, though, I believe the paper was a solid one, maybe not my best work, but an effective analysis of an online journalist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Later on we shifted our focus away from &lt;em&gt;Good Reasons&lt;/em&gt; and began delving more into the world of blogging and articles on technology and society. Our first assignment taken from the online reserves was an essay by Walter Benjamin titled “The Storyteller”. Our assignment was to write a blog discussing Benjamin’s essay. &lt;a href="http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_admblog_archive.html#106305669409005194"&gt;My blog entry&lt;/a&gt; argued that although Benjamin made a valid point when he stated that the art of storytelling was in decline, he was unable to see the aspects of literature that were not in decline. He was unable to see how in many ways literature is improving in our world and “As storytelling declines, new forms of literature and communication rise”. As evidence I mentioned the radio, television and internet as new forms of communication. This was one of my longer blog posts, and also one of my strongest ones. I quoted several times from Benjamin’s essay and thoroughly discussed what I agreed and disagreed upon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;One of the final topics we covered in &lt;em&gt;Good Reasons&lt;/em&gt; was causal arguments. We were each given the assignment of finding a causal argument online and discussing how the author makes his or her argument. At first I struggled in finding a causal argument. After searching for a while I landed on an article in the editorials section of the AJC. The article was written by Gaston Caperton and was titled &lt;a href="http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/0903/25sat.html"&gt;“High Turnout Makes SAT Data Deceptive”&lt;/a&gt;. The article made a causal argument against an earlier article written by an AJC writer. The previous writer had discussed Georgia’s poor academic standards and had cited the fact that our state has the lowest average SAT score in the country. Caperton argued against this by pointing out the fact that Georgia has one of the highest percentages of high school students actually taking the SAT. In &lt;a href="http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_admblog_archive.html#106454873771306231"&gt;my blog post&lt;/a&gt; I identified his type of argument as being the single difference method. I showed how Caperton found the single difference between Georgia’s SAT scores and those of states with higher scores. This was an effective blog post because I clearly stated Caperton’s causal argument and cited several quotes to back up my statement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gtg910q/ENGL/Essay2.htm"&gt;The second essay&lt;/a&gt; topic of the year was an argumentative essay giving an evaluative argument of a visual text. For my visual text I chose the music video for &lt;a href="http://www.pearljam.com/"&gt;Pearl Jam&lt;/a&gt;’s song “Do the Evolution”. I made the argument that the video was an effective satire against humankind’s belief in its own superiority. Of the two essays I wrote this year, this one was the stronger one. I analyzed the video in great depth. I watched it on my computer dozens of times; slowing down the speed of the video to catch the details that I missed at normal speed. Looking back on the paper I could’ve analyzed it even further, going into even more detail about some of the more confusing aspects of the video. But as a whole I believe my analysis worked well, and I also had the chance to discuss other aspects of the video besides the imagery. I also focused on emotions and themes. The video used emotions very effectively. I discussed how it portrayed and evoked emotions such as sadness, anger and sarcasm. The themes present in the video helped “tie the video together” and gave it a sense of storyline. In my essay I listed and analyzed the themes present in this video. If I were to do another draft of this essay I would include a more in-depth analysis of individual scenes along with a more organized structure to the essay as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;One of the assignments that I struggled with this year was the &lt;a href="http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_admblog_archive.html#106519112540313682"&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt; I wrote about &lt;a href="http://www.documentedlife.com/"&gt;Miles Hochstein’s Documented Life&lt;/a&gt; website. Our assignment for that blog post was to write about the relationship between photography and memory. Many have argued that photography does not preserve real memories, and is merely a way of covering up the true memories. I struggled with this blog post partially because of my lack of interest in photography. It helps to write an argument about photography if you have experience with it. I have never owned a camera, and even when my parents buy me disposable cameras I do not take that many pictures. I also struggled with this assignment because it was hard to write about his website. The writing in it was sparse. He had maybe a few sentences per year, and the photographs were far more numerous. But it is hard to find a topic from photographs. I was able to get the assignment done, but I wasn’t very pleased with it. I believe I could improve on similar assignments in the future.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This course has helped me become a better writer and a stronger arguer. I have experienced new and different writing styles and have learned various forms of arguments. Styles and argument types are important to writing effective essays and proving a point. From this course I have also been exposed to the world of blogging. I knew nothing of this online craze before this semester and now I feel like I am deeply immersed in it. I now visit other blogs regularly, even without assignments. Our focus on other digital technologies has also helped my writing ability. Analyzing a visual text helped me develop new and important skills in the art of visual interpretation. The skills I have learned this semester are vital to my future. Strong writing skills and knowledge of modern digital technologies are essential to a successful future in our society.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-107084198932791467?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/107084198932791467'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/107084198932791467'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_12_01_archive.html#107084198932791467' title='So This is the End. . .'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106921338354016372</id><published>2003-11-18T22:43:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-11-18T22:44:22.606-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Future of Telecommuting</title><content type='html'>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;In William J. Mitchell's essay "Homes and Neighborhoods" he discusses the future of the commercial world in relationship to telecommuting. Mitchell believes that with the advent of new communication technologies the workplace and the home will become united in a "live/work" situation. He also believes that the places people choose to live will become less influenced by the proximity to the workspace and more influenced by its appeal as a place to be.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Mitchell presents many interesting and plausible ideas in his essay. In the future technology is definitely going to change the workspace, but I doubt it will completely redefine it. Already we have the ability to telecommute, yet it has not caught on to the extent some imagined it would several years ago. Part of this is due to the fact that many employers are resistant to the idea. When all of an employer's workers are in one building, or one floor in most cases, he or she has the ability to watch over them, have face-to-face conversations with them, and develop relationships with them. These are very important aspects to the workplace and are part of the reason that I believe telecommuting will never completely take hold of our economy. The people who will be able to take advantage of the telecommuting options will mainly be the self-employed. My father is self-employed and works in an office above our garage. He is a computer consultant and programmer. He communicates with his clients mainly by telephone, and fixes their problems by remotely connecting to their servers from home. But even he has to occasionally leave his office to work. If there is a big enough problem at one of his clients companies he has to travel there to fix it. But without telecommunications his job would not be possible. He has clients all around the country, making it impossible to be at their workspaces regularly. This is the way that I believe telecommunications has really influenced business. Businesses can communicate over farther distances with other branches and other companies.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106921338354016372?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106921338354016372'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106921338354016372'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html#106921338354016372' title='The Future of Telecommuting'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106845188063080852</id><published>2003-11-10T03:11:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-11-14T03:42:58.390-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Online News vs. On the Couch News</title><content type='html'>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;In Tara McPherson’s “Reload” she discusses the illusion of “liveness” created by the web and how it is similar to that of television. She makes the claim that in many ways the web is taking over television’s use as a source of information.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I tend to disagree with this claim. I believe television and the web are two different entities. They both have their purposes, and while they may share a few, they also have many unique ones. McPherson argues that the internet provides us with instantaneous information. With the internet we have the ability to get news immediately, instead of waiting for the late night news. But in my own personal experience the web has not replaced the television as a source of news. Both of my parents still watch the late night news almost every night. Maybe this is not as immediate news as they would find on the internet, but it is easier. With the internet one must first turn on the computer, usually at least a couple minute process, open up a web browser, navigate to the site, find the news article he or she wishes to read, and read that article. To watch TV, All my parents have to do is go into our lounge, turn on the television and sit down on the sofa (often with a glass of wine) and watch. It is also a social activity. My parents watch together, and sometimes the rest of my family does as well. But we cannot all sit down in front of a computer, it just wouldn’t work. And as they watch the news they can talk to each other, cook dinner, or just enjoy themselves.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;My dad does use the internet for news a lot, but that is while he is working and already at a computer. If you are already at a computer, online news is more convenient. You can have many windows open with different news sites on each and you can choose which articles you want to read. Also, the articles are usually linked to related articles, so it is very easy to find more information if you are still interested after finishing. If you find an article interesting and would like to share it, you can email the link to your friends and family.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The internet may be a faster and more dynamic information source than the television but it does not replace the television. The television still holds on with its convenience and simplicity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106845188063080852?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106845188063080852'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106845188063080852'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html#106845188063080852' title='Online News vs. On the Couch News'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106787823886611747</id><published>2003-11-03T11:50:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-11-05T12:02:39.140-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Photography and Memory</title><content type='html'>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;In one section of Roland Barthes’ &lt;em&gt;Camera Lucida&lt;/em&gt; he talks about his mother’s death and how he looked through old photographs of her to try to find a photograph that captured her essence. Eventually he stumbles across a photo that he dubs the “Winter Garden Photograph” that is the most effective in capturing his mother’s true spirit. He says that he cannot explain why this photograph affects him in this way, but he does describe the way his mother is standing back from her brother, as if she is timid to be in the picture.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Barthes is making the point that photography cannot capture the essence of someone and it cannot preserve his or her memory. He makes a legitimate point but at the same time I don’t completely agree with his feelings on photography. I don’t think photography was ever meant to capture the essence or spirit of someone. It is merely a tool for capturing an image. Usually, that image is one which the photographer would like to be able to look back on and remember. Photography isn’t a substitute for memory, it merely refreshes it. When I look at old photographs of me sometimes I cannot remember the time they were taken and sometimes I can. If I can remember when it was taken that usually leads to more memories of what I was doing at the time and what I was doing before and after the picture was taken. If I did not have photographs many of these memories would never be brought to the surface again. I think that if Barthes’ wants to find a way of capturing his mother’s essence I think he should stick to his original plan of writing about her. Writing is a far better way of remembering what someone was truly like.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106787823886611747?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106787823886611747'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106787823886611747'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html#106787823886611747' title='Photography and Memory'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106764920843774302</id><published>2003-10-31T20:13:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-11-02T21:15:46.846-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Uncle Josh in "Uncle Josh at the Moving Picture Show"</title><content type='html'>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;In Thomas A. Edison’s short film “&lt;a href="http://memory.loc.gov/mbrs/edmp/1917.mpg"&gt;Uncle Josh at the Moving Picture Show&lt;/a&gt;” he portrays the character Uncle Josh as an uneducated man from the country who does not understand the concept of cinema. While watching a film on the screen he becomes excited by a lady dancing and tries to dance with her. He checks behind the screen to see where she is but he cannot find her and he becomes confused. In the next scene a train approaches the screen and he jumps out of the way in fright for he fears the train is actually driving at him. Eventually he becomes frustrated and tears down the screen, which leads to a fight between him and the man showing the movie.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This is a very comical piece of film. It is completely silent yet it manages to portray feelings, thoughts and emotions all through the actions of Uncle Josh. When the people are dancing on screen Josh dances along with them, showing happiness and excitement. His fear is easy to identify when the train approaches and his frustration with the cinema is very evident when he tears down the screen. This is what makes the film so entertaining. Josh’s emotions and actions are amusing. Considering the limitations of cinema for the time, this is a very well made film. It is hard to convey emotions without sound, and it is even harder to make people laugh. This film does both of these tasks excellently.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106764920843774302?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106764920843774302'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106764920843774302'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106764920843774302' title='Uncle Josh in &quot;Uncle Josh at the Moving Picture Show&quot;'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106666378454989217</id><published>2003-10-20T10:29:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-20T10:29:44.400-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Ansel Adams at the High</title><content type='html'>On Sunday, my roommate Derek and I went to the &lt;a href="http://www.high.org/index_flash.html"&gt;High Museum of Art&lt;/a&gt;. We decided that instead of analyzing the organization and layout of the entire museum that we would focus on one exhibit, and discover the organization and layout for one small but important part of the museum. When we entered the High Museum we rode an elevator to the top floor. The primary exhibit in the museum at this point in time is an exhibit featuring photography by Ansel Adams. After getting off the elevator we noticed a short introduction written on the wall before we entered the exhibit. It told a brief history of Ansel Adams’ life and career. As we walked around the exhibit we tried to discover how the photographs were organized. At first we looked at the dates, but they did not line up chronologically. After that idea failed we started examining the photographs in certain areas and we noticed that they were arranged by themes. On one wall there were pictures of desert scenes and then on another wall were only pictures of buildings. Other themes included canyons, domes, people, the coast, and geysers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As we proceeded further into the exhibit, the themes started to vary. At one point we noticed another brief chunk of writing on a wall. It discussed Adams’ involvement in the environmental movement and in the Sierra Club and how both of these influenced his photography. Around this chunk of writing were pictures that he took either for the Sierra Club or as activism in the environmental organization. A later section was entitled “Documentary, Commercial, and Experimentation in Color”. In this section there were pictures that he had taken for documentaries and commercial use. He also spent a short period of his life experimenting in color photography.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The final section of the museum was called “Legacy”. In this section were photographers that were either inspired by Ansel Adams or produced similar work to his. This section was not organized by theme but by photographer. Each wall or chunk of wall had a different photographer’s work displayed. In the paragraph next to the photograph it discussed the relation between this artist and Ansel Adams. After exiting the exhibit there was a small shop set up selling photographs and other miscellaneous items that related to Ansel Adams.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106666378454989217?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106666378454989217'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106666378454989217'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106666378454989217' title='Ansel Adams at the High'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106580989473540140</id><published>2003-10-10T13:18:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-10T13:37:37.493-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Paper Topic: Pearl Jam - "Do the Evolution" Music Video</title><content type='html'>For my paper I plan to write about the music video for Pearl Jam’s song “Do the Evolution”. It is my favorite music video. It is quite different from normal music videos. For one, it is entirely animated. Also, no member of the band appears in the video, even in animated form. Another reason I enjoy it so much is that it makes sense. A lot of music videos are completely incoherent. They seem like a bunch of random scenes or images put to music with occasional shots of the band. The Pearl Jam video follows along with the song excellently.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The song is about the evolution of man as the dominant species in the world. It is a very dark, angry, and ironic song. One line that catches the theme of the song well is “I can kill because in God I trust”. The music video shows a very fast forward version of evolution starting with a single-celled organism and ending with man. Along the process of evolving the more advanced creatures start killing the less advanced creatures. When the video reaches the stage of humans as we are now it is filled with images of war, murder, death, and destruction. The final scene of the video is that of a nuclear bomb destroying a city.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The criteria I plan to use to evaluate this video are the effectiveness of the presentation, the correlation between the song and video, the uniqueness of the video, and the powerful message that the music video sends.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(If you would like to watch the movie, you can download it here: &lt;a href="http://www.thewonderllama.com/bands/pjvideos.shtml"&gt;http://www.thewonderllama.com/bands/pjvideos.shtml&lt;/a&gt;. You will need quicktime or another player that supports .mp4 files to play it)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106580989473540140?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106580989473540140'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106580989473540140'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106580989473540140' title='Paper Topic: Pearl Jam - &quot;Do the Evolution&quot; Music Video'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106519112540313682</id><published>2003-10-03T09:25:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-03T09:28:00.260-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Photography as Digital Memory</title><content type='html'>I have never been very interested in photography. I guess part of the reason would be that I have never owned a camera. But even when my mom would buy me a disposable camera for vacations or camps I would come home having only taken three or four pictures. It is not that I don’t enjoy looking at photos. I love looking through old family photo albums and trying to remember the time the picture was taken. I also enjoyed looking through Miles Hochstein’s documented life (&lt;a href="http://www.documentedlife.com/"&gt;http://www.documentedlife.com/&lt;/a&gt;). His website is very unique. I would not be willing to share so much of my life with strangers, but he is comfortable doing so. Miles makes an interesting point about photography in the year &lt;a href="http://www.documentedlife.com/1999.htm"&gt;1999&lt;/a&gt;. In his second paragraph he states “actual memories? I’m afraid I don’t have any… just photos”. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But is photography a way of preserving memories? Or is it just a way of preserving one particular instance of your life? Most photographs are far from realistic. Everyone stands in front of the camera and puts on a usually fake smile and the photographer snaps the shot. When, besides in photographs, do you stand with a group of people all looking in a particular direction smiling for approximately five seconds? But a photograph can spur other memories. When I look through photo albums of my family I initially remember the taking of the picture, but after that I start to remember the time when the picture was taken. I remember what happened, who was there, how I felt. In that way photographs are an excellent way of preserving memories. Many events in my life I would not bother to remember if I didn’t have photos of the time they happened. And there are also other forms of photography that are a far more accurate representation of life. Many photographers are into taking candid shots. Candid shots show what was actually happening at the time, but they are flawed as well. A candid shot still is only taking in one particular instance of time. It is hardly capturing an entire memory.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Photography may not be the most accurate representation of a memory, but it is still important. Photographs evoke emotions. In the year &lt;a href="http://www.documentedlife.com/2000.htm"&gt;2000&lt;/a&gt;, Miles’ daughter was born and “The rest was trivial”. On that page of his website he has a picture of him with his baby sleeping on his arm. The emotions that picture evokes for Miles’ must be incredibly strong. Even if photography is not always genuine the emotions it provokes are, and this makes it important.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106519112540313682?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106519112540313682'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106519112540313682'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106519112540313682' title='Photography as Digital Memory'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106454873771306231</id><published>2003-09-25T22:58:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-25T23:02:02.400-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Caperton's Causal Argument</title><content type='html'>Gaston Caperton uses causal argument in his article “High turnout makes SAT data deceptive” (&lt;a href="http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/0903/25sat.html"&gt;http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/0903/25sat.html&lt;/a&gt;) to argue that “it is inappropriate to compare Georgia’s SAT scores, which are based on 56,000 seniors and 66 percent of high school graduates, with those of many states where only a few hundred take the SAT”. He uses the single difference method to make his argument. He takes two similar circumstances and finds the one difference between them. In the case of this article the similar circumstances are average SAT scores in states in the US. Georgia is ranked 50th for SAT scores. North Dakota, Mississippi and Iowa all have high SAT scores. The single difference is that in North Dakota, Mississippi and Iowa “Fewer than 6 percent of high school graduates complete the SAT”. In the states where only a small percentage take the SAT, the percentage that do take it “have much stronger academic backgrounds and apply to much more selective colleges”.&lt;br /&gt;	&lt;br /&gt;Caperton’s method of comparison is very effective for this argument. He establishes that not only Georgia, but many of the states with high percentages of graduates taking the SATs have lower scores than states with low percentages of graduates taking the SATs. He uses many specific examples in his article and presents statistics on each of them. He is also a very credible source for making this argument. Caperton is the “president of The College Board, sponsor of the SAT”. The College Board created the data on SAT scores in US states. Gaston’s effective use of the single difference method and his ethos make for a very strong argument against SAT data as a means of ranking a state's educational program.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106454873771306231?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106454873771306231'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106454873771306231'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106454873771306231' title='Caperton&apos;s Causal Argument'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106394452185617593</id><published>2003-09-18T23:08:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-18T23:10:09.050-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Storytelling as A Form of Argument</title><content type='html'>In Riverbend’s blog entry “Terrorists…” (&lt;a href="http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/"&gt;http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;) she talks about raids done by the United States military against Iraqi homes. Riverbend is an Iraqi woman living in Baghdad. She uses her blog to discuss “war, politics and occupation”. Since the end of the war the United States military has been ordered to randomly raid houses of Iraqi citizens in search of illegal weapons. Riverbend believes this is wrong. She mentions when “… raids go horribly wrong … [and] Family members are shot, others are detained and often women and children are left behind wailing”.&lt;br /&gt;	&lt;br /&gt;The style of argument that Riverbend uses in her blog is very effective in proving her point. She tells stories but never directly states her beliefs on a subject. The stories are very personal and very moving. The main rhetorical appeal that Riverbend uses in her blog is pathos. Her blog is very emotional. All of her stories are about her life and she obviously cares about what she is writing. After reading an article in her blog it is difficult not to share her emotions. She manages to make the reader feel a part of her world. They feel sorry for her situation and want to connect with her. It is very difficult to argue against her blog. All of her points are made through stories, and the reader is supposed to realize what she believes by reading her blog and coming to that same belief. After reading her blog on the raids I felt that raids were wrong too.&lt;br /&gt;	&lt;br /&gt;Riverbend argues by telling stories. Stories are an excellent way to argue. If it is a good story then it is difficult for the reader to stop reading it. She will want to know what happens in the story and will therefore read until it is finished. In other situations the same reader might quit reading an argument because she disagreed with it’s main point or because she was not interested in the subject.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106394452185617593?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106394452185617593'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106394452185617593'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106394452185617593' title='Storytelling as A Form of Argument'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106305669409005194</id><published>2003-09-08T16:31:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-08T16:31:34.090-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Changing Tides of Literature</title><content type='html'>	In Walter Benjamin’s essay “The Storyteller” he argues that the art of storytelling is in decline. In his opening paragraph he states that the storyteller “…has already become something remote from us and something that is getting even more distant” (Benjamin 83) and that “… the art of storytelling is coming to an end” (83). This issue concerns him greatly. He believes that the loss of storytelling has caused the world of literature to decline as well. As storytelling is declining “…the communicability of experience is decreasing” (86). With the invention of the printing press communication has changed greatly, and the novel has risen as storytelling has declined. Benjamin regards greatly the importance of oral tradition and the novel “…neither comes from oral tradition nor goes into it” (87). The novelist “…isolate[s] himself” (87).&lt;br /&gt;	&lt;br /&gt;While I agree that the art of storytelling has declined since Benjamin’s time and that the novel is a more solitary form of literature, I disagree with him about the decline of literature as a whole. The advances in the technology of communication have not caused a decline in literature. If anything they have made literature better. Mass communication has caused more people to have access to literature than ever before. This has caused more people to become educated and have the ability to write their own literature. As storytelling declines, new forms of literature and communication rise. Benjamin discusses the rise of the novel. He has qualms with the novel because it is not an oral tradition. The writing of a novel is a solitary task, and the novel will remain, for the most part, unchanged throughout time. But many novels can be regarded as works of art. Works of art should remain the way the artist created them. Altering a novel by James Joyce would be just as unimaginable as altering a Picasso. The other forms of literature and communication that have risen in the past century include the cinema, television and the internet. All of these have contributed in good ways and bad. Each one has caused many people to read less traditional literature. Movies and television have caused literacy to decline. But they have many positive aspects as well. Many movies are just as artful as books. Television, along with radio, is a new and advanced form of storytelling. It may not have the same style as Benjamin’s storytelling, but it reaches a wider audience and is still very focused on the oral side of literature. The internet brings us the ability to communicate with people all over the world and to voice our opinion in the most public of all settings. It has made the world a much smaller place and communication has become instantaneous.&lt;br /&gt;	&lt;br /&gt;Benjamin was correct in saying that traditional storytelling has declined and that technology is changing the world of literature. But the world of literature has not become any worse since his time. It has changed in good ways and bad. Literature will never decline because of technology. It will change definitely, and many forms will be lost, but new forms will always come along with just as much importance to the world as the old forms.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106305669409005194?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106305669409005194'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106305669409005194'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106305669409005194' title='The Changing Tides of Literature'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106256577690948225</id><published>2003-09-03T00:09:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-03T00:10:18.036-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Ethics of Blogging</title><content type='html'>	In Rachel Blood’s weblog entry entitled “Weblog Ethics” (&lt;a href="http://www.rebeccablood.net/handbook/excerpts/weblog_ethics.html"&gt;http://www.rebeccablood.net/handbook/excerpts/weblog_ethics.html&lt;/a&gt;) she argues that “The weblog’s greatest strength--its uncensored, unmediated, uncontrolled voice--is also it’s greatest weakness”. Her proposed solution to this dilemma is a set of “six rules that… form a basis of ethical behavior for online publishers of all kinds”. The six rules are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font size=-2&gt;&lt;em&gt;1.	Publish as fact only that which you believe to be true.&lt;br /&gt;2.	If material exists online, link to it when you reference it.&lt;br /&gt;3.	Publicly correct any misinformation.&lt;br /&gt;4.	Write each entry as if it could not be changed; add to, but do not rewrite or delete, any entry.&lt;br /&gt;5.	Disclose any conflict of interest.&lt;br /&gt;6.	Note questionable and biased sources.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These are the responsibilities that she believes online publishers have toward their readers.&lt;br /&gt;	For the most part I agree with what Ms. Blood says in her blog post. If you are not certain of information you should not post it as fact. I agree with this statement in all aspects of communication, not just weblogs. The only problem with this rule is its near impossibility to enforce. There will always be people who publish as fact that which isn’t true. Whether intentionally or unintentionally it will happen, and weblogs are unedited, so many of these wrong facts will go unnoticed. I also agree that all material referenced in a blog should be linked. This is common practice in other types of publication, and the failure to do so can result in legal action against the publisher. In addition to this, every publisher deserves credit for his work. Failing to link to references does not give the original publisher full credit for what he or she has published. Her third rule encompasses all misinformation, but there is a lot of misinformation that could be corrected without noting the correction. Typos are generally recognized by the reader and corrected automatically, thus pointing them out seems more trouble than it is worth. All serious errors should be corrected in the style she suggests, but for minor errors it should be left to the judgment of the publisher. &lt;br /&gt;	Ms. Blood’s ethics code for blogging is generally very reasonable, but some of the details of her rules need more work or more clarification. The world of blogging would be improved dramatically if this system could be enacted, but it is impossible to enforce. They are not so much rules as they are guidelines. Some people will follow these guidelines religiously, but there will always be people who choose not to follow them. When some people do not follow the guidelines it becomes very difficult for the reader to ascertain if the blog they are reading is respectable or not. The reputation of a blogger is developed over time with continuous postings and regular readers. This will always be true even with Ms. Blood’s ethical code for blogging.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106256577690948225?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106256577690948225'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106256577690948225'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106256577690948225' title='The Ethics of Blogging'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106213674227891852</id><published>2003-08-29T00:59:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-31T15:59:43.480-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Analyzing "Damn the Media" by Rachel Lucas</title><content type='html'>	In this blog I will be analyzing the language and style of Rachel Lucas’ blog entitled “Damn the Media”. It is featured on her website &lt;a href="http://www.rachellucas.com"&gt;www.rachellucas.com&lt;/a&gt;. In the article, Lucas criticizes the media for deciding not to do any special programming for the second anniversary of 9/11 because of the upcoming elections. She argues that they don’t want to influence the elections by showing footage of 9/11, and she expresses her belief that this is appalling. She has a very upfront and informal style of arguing that also incorporates her emotions and humor quite effectively.&lt;br /&gt;	Lucas’ style is very aggressive. She begins her article with “What in the hell is wrong with people?” This is a very effective way to begin because it grabs the attention of its readers and makes them keep reading. After making the statement she begins to explain herself. She quotes an article from the NY Post that states that none of the major broadcasting channels will be airing any special programming for the second anniversary of 9/11 because of the upcoming elections. Now she has made it clear what her article is actually about. She has also made it clear exactly where she stands on this issue.&lt;br /&gt;	Her style of writing is very informal. She writes as if she were speaking. She has no formal structure to her writing. One paragraph of her writing is simply “I don't get it. I don't get it. I. Do. Not. Get. It”. This paragraph would never appear in a formal essay, but in her article it is very effective. It is easy to imagine Lucas’ becoming very emotional about this subject and venting about the appalling behavior of the media. Also, she is not afraid to use curse words and sentence fragments in her article. In doing so she makes a connection with the reader. The reader feels like he or she is actually listening to Lucas speak instead of reading a polished essay that she mulled over for hours and revised several times.&lt;br /&gt;	She uses humor and emotions effectively to support her argument. Her style of writing almost makes you smile because it is so blunt and aggressive. It is entertaining when she goes off on a person or organization. At the same time there is a serious side to the essay. She obviously cares about this issue and wishes to tell people how she feels. She talks about the aftermath of the attacks and the unfurling of the flag over the pentagon and how “that moment made [her] feel like everything would be okay again. [She doesn’t] know why, it just did”. The ability to express her emotions so vividly to her readers makes her arguments more valid.&lt;br /&gt;	Lucas’ style and language in her writing is very effective. It is unpolished and aggressive. She makes no attempt to write a formal essay, and the added humor and emotion make her arguments more effective. The one criticism I have of Lucas’ blog is its apparent one-sidedness. She never takes the time to address how the media conglomerates might justify not airing any special programming for 9/11. If she did this she could debase their arguments further by proving their falsities. On the whole, though, I believe “Damn the Media” is a very effective argument against the actions of the media concerning an important event in our nation’s history.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106213674227891852?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106213674227891852'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106213674227891852'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106213674227891852' title='Analyzing &quot;Damn the Media&quot; by Rachel Lucas'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5708486.post-106148369060255208</id><published>2003-08-21T11:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-31T15:40:45.336-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Introduction</title><content type='html'>Hello and welcome to my new Blog. My name is Andrew Marshall. My hometown is right here in Atlanta, Georgia, about five miles away near Emory University. I have lived there all of my life. Now I live on West Campus in Montag Hall. My roommate is named Derek Constantine and he is also taking this class but at a different time. I have known him since the 6th Grade. Both of us went to the Paideia School from 1st grade until 12th. Paideia is a small private school off of Ponce de Leon Ave.&lt;br /&gt;In my family, I am the youngest of 3. I have an older brother named Taylor and an older sister named Laura. Taylor is 21, Laura is 24, and I am 18. My mother, Georgia, is a Pre-K teacher at Montgomery Elementary. My father, Robert, was a lawyer for 25 years, but he quit many years ago and started a software company called Notation, Inc. My sister used to work for Random House Publishing in New York City, but now she teaches English and Latin at the Donellan School in Atlanta. My brother is currently enrolled at Georgia College &amp; State University. While in high school I worked at a butcher shop, a bicycle shop, a law firm, and I started my own business.&lt;br /&gt;I am looking forward to my first year at Georgia Tech, and I hope that I am here for my second year of Georgia Tech. We will see.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5708486-106148369060255208?l=admblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106148369060255208'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5708486/posts/default/106148369060255208'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://admblog.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106148369060255208' title='Introduction'/><author><name>Andrew</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06055938826092256179</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
